Injury claims in Richmond, California

I take injury cases from Richmond and the rest of Contra Costa County. This page is not a sales pitch for the city — it is what the state's own crash record says about Richmond, where a case from here is filed, and where the badly injured are taken. This is general information, not legal advice.

What the crash record shows for Richmond

Officers in Richmond reported 3,153 crashes in 2023 and 2024 together. Those crashes killed 28 people and injured 1,213. The two years were not level — the later year was higher: 1,513 in 2023 and 1,640 in 2024.

The most common kind of crash in Richmond was rear-end, on 919 reports. Next was sideswipe (917). Of the 3,153 crashes, 101 involved a pedestrian, 63 a bicycle, 64 a motorcycle and 220 a commercial truck.

Two things these counts are not. They are counts of reported crashes, so anything nobody reported is missing, and reporting practice differs between agencies. And they are not adjusted for how many people drive, walk or ride in Richmond — a bigger place will report more crashes than a smaller one without being more dangerous. A gap of a few between two categories is ordinary year-to-year variation rather than a finding.

1,188 of the 3,153 — about 38% — were recorded as hit-and-run, 133 of them as a felony. A driver who leaves is a real problem for a claim and not always a fatal one: your own uninsured motorist coverage is written for exactly this. How hit-and-run claims work.

What officers in Richmond write down as the cause

On a California crash report the officer records a "primary collision factor" — the Vehicle Code section they believe was broken. In Richmond the section cited most often was Veh. Code, § 22350, on 859 reports: driving faster than was safe for the conditions — which is not the same as breaking the posted limit, and is why a driver can be at fault for speeding at 30 in a 35. The next most common was Veh. Code, § 21658, subd. (a) (494) — not staying as nearly as practical within a single marked lane, or leaving the lane before it was safe.

That is the officer's view at the scene. It is not a finding of fault, it binds nobody, and insurers argue about it constantly — but it is worth knowing what the report on your own crash is likely to say before an adjuster reads it to you. How to read a California traffic collision report.

Where crashes concentrate in Richmond

17 surface-street junctions inside Richmond carry enough reported crashes to rank, and each one's location was confirmed by two independent sources before it was published. Junctions that could not be confirmed were dropped rather than guessed at, so this is a floor, not a complete list.

Confirmed junctions in Richmond, 2023–2024
# Junction County Crashes Injured Killed
1 22ND St & Macdonald Av Contra Costa 24 13 0
2 23RD St & Macdonald Av Contra Costa 23 8 0
3 22ND St & Barrett Av Contra Costa 21 16 0
4 37TH St & Macdonald Av Contra Costa 14 17 0
5 Richmond Pkwy & San Pablo Av Contra Costa 14 3 0
6 Carlson Blvd & Cutting Blvd Contra Costa 13 9 1
7 Cutting Blvd & Harbour Wy S Contra Costa 13 5 0
8 Lakeside Dr & Richmond Pkwy Contra Costa 12 5 1
9 Harbour Wy S & Ohio Av Contra Costa 12 6 0
10 Hilltop Dr & Shane Dr Contra Costa 12 2 0
11 19TH St & Barrett Av Contra Costa 11 8 0
12 23RD St & Rheem Av Contra Costa 11 3 0
13 Bayview Av & Carlson Blvd Contra Costa 11 2 0
14 Barrett Av & Marina Wy Contra Costa 10 8 0
15 Barrett Av & San Pablo Av Contra Costa 10 3 0

The full list of 17 confirmed Richmond junctions .

The surface roads named most often on Richmond crash reports were 23rd St (110), Richmond Pkwy (104), Cutting Blvd (99), Barrett Av (96), Macdonald Av (95) and Carlson Blvd (82). A road appears here because it was written in the "primary road" field, so a long arterial running the width of the city will naturally outrank a short street — this is where reports cluster, not a ranking of danger. Officers also write the same road down in more than one way, so a single corridor can appear twice under two spellings; the counts are not combined, because deciding that two spellings are the same road is a guess.

Freeway and state-route segments are counted separately, because they are a different case: the roadway is Caltrans', the patrol is usually CHP, and the junction ranking above deliberately excludes them. In Richmond the segments named most often were I-80 E/B (374), I-80 W/B (339), I-580 W/B (149) and I-580 E/B (92). Across the whole city, 41% of crashes were flagged as freeway crashes.

34% of Richmond crashes happened in darkness or at dusk rather than in daylight. The most common non-daylight condition recorded was darkness with street lighting. Lighting matters more than people expect, because street lighting is the public entity's responsibility and a burnt-out light at the point of impact is a fact worth establishing early.

Where a Richmond case is filed

Richmond sits in Contra Costa County, so a case from here is normally filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa. Code of Civil Procedure section 395 makes the county where the injury happened a proper court, and so is the county where a defendant lived when the case was filed. Which of that county's courthouses hears it, and which forms have to go with the first filing, is set by that court's local rules rather than by the statute.

For what it is worth, the crash reports themselves name a court district. Richmond reports were routed to Bay Superior, Richmond Superior Court George D. Carroll Courthouse, Bay Municipal and Contra Costa Superior Court Walnut Creek Courthouse. That is the district for the traffic matter on the report — it is not a determination of civil venue, and an injury case is not bound to follow it.

Contra Costa County — venue, courthouses and the claim clock · the forms a California injury case starts with · how a claim runs from start to finish.

If the city, the county or the state is responsible

Some crashes are not only about another driver. A signal on the wrong phase, a road that hides an approach, a missing sign, a marked crosswalk leading somewhere unlit — those point at a public entity, and the clock is different and much shorter. A claim against a public entity generally has to be presented to that entity within six months of the injury, and it goes to the clerk, secretary or auditor of the entity itself rather than to a court. Miss it and the ordinary two-year deadline will not save you.

Claims against a government entity in California · dangerous conditions of public property.

Where the badly injured go in Contra Costa County

Contra Costa County has one designated trauma centre. Which one you were taken to matters to a claim for a dull reason: that is where the first imaging, the first operative note and the first record of what you complained of all live, and those records do more work in an injury case than almost anything else.

Your medical records in an injury claim · the injuries these claims turn on.

What I handle in Richmond

Common questions

Where would a Richmond injury case be filed?
In the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, in most cases. Code of Civil Procedure section 395 makes the county where the injury happened a proper court, and so is the county where a defendant lived when the case was filed. Which courthouse inside the county hears it is a matter of that court's own local rules, not of the statute.
Do these numbers say anything about my case?
No. They describe reported crashes in a place over two years. They are not adjusted for how many people drive, walk or ride there, they say nothing about who was at fault in any crash, and nothing here is a prediction about any claim. This is general information, not legal advice.
What does the "primary collision factor" on a report mean?
It is the Vehicle Code section the officer at the scene thought was broken. It is an opinion formed quickly, it is frequently revised, and it does not decide fault. It is useful because it shows what officers in a place are seeing, not because it settles anything.
The city or county may be responsible. Does that change the deadline?
Yes, and it is the change that catches people out. A claim against a public entity generally has to be presented to that entity within six months, long before the ordinary two-year deadline to file suit. That applies to a city vehicle, and it applies to a claim that a road or signal was itself dangerous.

Start a case review call

On a case review call, I go through the facts with you: what happened, when, whether you were hurt, whether anyone represents you, and how to reach you. It is not legal advice, and I will not put a value on your claim.

Start a case review call

Sources: crash counts, collision types, cited factors, lighting and named roads from the California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), California Highway Patrol, 2023 and 2024 exports, retrieved 2026-09-02; junction locations confirmed against the US Census Geocoder and a second independent source (method and limitations). Trauma centre designations from the California Emergency Medical Services Authority, "California Designated / ACS Verified Trauma Centers", updated 25 August 2025. Venue: Code Civ. Proc., § 395 (amended Stats. 2002, ch. 806, § 8). Government claims: Gov. Code, § 911.2 and § 915 (amended Stats. 2020, ch. 371, § 7).